>>54882987>>54883051> SS raids are considerably more difficult soloConstantly spewing bullshit, doesn't make it true. I've made plenty of meme teams in SS for competitive and it's hilarious you believe this shit. You can take any pokemon to SS raids, you can't take any pokemon to S/V raids purely because of Tera. S/V raids are much harder (evident by how many people still bring the wrong mons) and Tera, you have to know what the pokemon's original typing is because they still get stab off of it.
>Granted they can be longer than 5 stars.Ah so they aren't like 5 star raids. Glad you finally admit that. Now we can move on.
>we're talking about the design of the raids.No, we're not. I'm talking about how much of a slog online tera raids are in S/V. If you don't play online, then you don't have much to say. I'm not going to argue with your [HEADCANON] whether or not which raids were designed multiplayer, that's just straight up retardation, when clearly Gamefreak advertise them as a online multiplayer feature.
>your definition of content doesn't make sense.Probably because you're a retard. Try playing older pokemon titles and compare what's missing and what's not, and what's an improvement and what isn't. I'm not going to spoonfeed you.
>You don't want more than the bare minimum. >You're just saying you're using video games to fill a void rather than liking video games.>Your standards are warped because you don't play the game for the sake of playing the game.Not an Argument.
>SV has its own content, they don't have to rehash the same game over and over again.That's right, cause you're going to buy it anyway.
>>54883099>English isn't your first language, anon>Someone as stubborn and dimwitted as yourself.>you're just giving us a clown to laugh at as you get everything little thing wrong.You failed to convince me that S/V has lived up to previous titles. If you aren't going to try and refute, then I accept your concession.
