>>29261145Still doesn't make sense.
Assume the bubble magnify theory is your basis,
The circled leg in figure A is hidden behind the bubble from out view. Us viewing the bubble, means we'd see that leg magnified, yet it's not magnified, it's the same perspective the leg should be at its supposed distance.
Your argument is that the head is magnified, but this is clearly contradicted by the fact the leg is not. Even if the head is in cased in the bubble, the view from our perspective would be the same, we would see both items magnified at proper focus.
At this angle, we would also see a subsequent Abdomen peeking out, which we do not.
