>>55507135>nope, the only people who are retarded are the ones who want megas back because they love laziness and they hate creativity. they are all shillsJust because you say it doesn't make it any more true than the last hundred times you said it. Make actual arguments instead of repeating the same buzzwords over and over, you're embarrassing yourself
>some like weavile and tangrowth could be considered as lazy as some mega evolutions but definitely not froslass and crobatPlease define what a lazy design is, because your standards for good design are nonsensical at best
>having more actual new mons instead of new forms of older mons would be betterDumbass, have you seen most of the new Pokemon designs? How many of them look anywhere near decent? How many of them do you see people singing the praises of? And you seriously think having more original designs alone will guarantee quality? You're a fucking joke
>gen 3 and 5 hardly revisited older mons>gen 5Gen 5 is full of Pokemon whose sole purpose is to be an obvious replacement for older Pokemon. Fucking hell, play the games you're trying to talk about for once in your life
>gamefreak came up with it because it would have simply been easier to draw kangakshan again so they can be lazy and avoid drawing more things from the ground upBut if they did change Kangaskhan's design for the Mega you'd just complain that it's too derivative and lazy, like you do for all the other Mega designs, so I don't even know what kind of point you think you're making. You're just a lazy contrarian faggot with no real argument who feels compelled to shit up any thread you see talking about Megas our of jealousy, you autistic cumstain