>>41891316Anon, listen to yourself. You're not even arguing about the split anymore, you're just trying to get me by pointing to the most extreme case so my statement is "technically wrong" even if it has nothing to do with the argument.
It's like if you're an anti-tree person and someone says "but planting more trees is good for the environment" and then you go on about this hypothetical world where there's so many trees that everyone dies. You're admitting that you don't have enough faith in your actual argument which makes me think you're arguing in bad faith.
I'm getting a lot of deja vu, so I'll take a break now. See you next thread.
>>41891303I don't hate HMs, but there's only so much you can do with them at the end of the day.
