> Name a single example of what this actually entails. What 'change' could occur if someone learns Japanese?It is a theory, anon. But for example, this:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797610386621I'm not saying learning Japanese will bring that change, but there could be some subtle, smaller changes.
>>55023616>You've now watered it down to 'influence', which still doesn't explain why a sapient creature apparently intelligent enough for you to want it to suck your dick can't figure out what the sound 'apple' means when spoken to.If it is this sapient and intelligent enough why does it not have its own language? The situation you describe is a fallacious one to begin with: it will understand what apple is if it learns language, that is the point.
> apparently intelligent enough for you to want it to suck your dickThat is a real weird criteria you have here, bro. Is there something you are not telling us.
> 'It's hotter when I can't fluently communicate with my romantic partner'.As opposed to what? Writing essentially a an average human character that happen to have a shape of a pokemon and that's about it?
> Before this interaction, there is no 'language'.Okay, why don't you define this no 'language'? If there is concept of language, how would one even begin to understand how to learn it? In your case, Pokemon just 'knows". Why?
> Because there is a confirmed intelligent creatorIntelligent creator also created picrelated, which is a frequent guest in suchi. Does it have a language? Do you converse with suchi?
> Sounds an awful lot like a language, being 'a combination of unique sounds' used to represent concepts.You took this remark out of context. But it is not particularly important.
