>>40915512>Yes, that's commitment to making a good product. Even if you personally dislike it you cannot deny it has received critical acclaim and innovated the seriesBut it took long than any pokemon game to make and still was barebones to the core
>But now we have less Pokemon.What does this have to do with the formula?
>It's more expensive than any other game. Because it's a switch game that makes more to create
>The practice of locking content behind 3rd versions when DLC is standard is also extremely anti-consumer. But having third versions are apart of the franchise's concept for awhile now. Go play some MMO if all you is DLCs. My example, Monster Hunter, also just recently stopped this practice.
>Can you quote him on that?Pic related
>No shit - it's the newest gameWhy are you ignoring this?
>it pales compared to other first party Nintendo games.It's been like this for decades now. You just haven't played anything outside of pokemon until now
