>>48922876I think that would be a big improvement. The artist who created that is so-so in my books, but I thought the image was decent by his standards.
>>48923406You are seriously clueless about the size and scale of 4chan archives, and also incurably lazy in the faggiest fashion
>prove my point for me! make ME believable!No mang, work on your own claims.
>>48923717Imbecile who browses archives considerably less than me detected. Come back when you have over 100 tabs across desu, arch.b4k and 4plebs open at once.
