Quoted By:
> But you won't accept a beginner drawing either
And you know this how? Oh, you imagined it because you think it must be so. Yet again, fallacy. I've already stated I've "accepted" bunch of basic sketches.
> le criteria
None of them had any specific "criteria", whatever that means in your imagination.
> And you think you deserve better. For your furry-kink request.
Ah yes, finally, we get to the main point all this word-salad was made for.
> you think you deserve better.
Projection. Especially eggregious after I stated multiple times that I think the request idea could be executed better, not that I demand or deserve it. But you already knew it, dont you. So you just twisted the meaning to suit your narrative. It became *I demaned it*. It became *I deserve it*.
> For your furry-kink request.
And? This means what? What is supposed to be argument? "Furry bad"? Pokemon is furry. So you ae furry then. You are bad. Oh no, you disagree? Well too bad, no one pulled your tongue, you got yourself into this trap now, let's see your mental gymanstics
> kink request.
Again - AND? Plenty of kink and lewd requests were and ARE delivered in /vp/. Picrelated was posted in previous thread, everyone were gooshing over it, including you. But NOW, when you need to make an argument that makes me lok BAD and WRONG you resort to "kind is bad! bad coomer! Point at him and laugh!".
Facetious Hypocrite.
> How is that a fallacy?
You are substituting original meaning with your own.
> I'm just trying to understand what you're saying man
Then you should have read the very first og post that made you so mad in a frist place. It is quite simple, really.
> I just told you why I thought it seemed like a commission to me.
Nobody asked nor needed your opinion on the matter.
