>>26631446>The implication there is that all Pokémon are defined by a genetic dataset (not necessarily a common one). How does this interact with eg.: inorganic Pokémon, or artificial construct Pokémon like the Regis and Castform?If you are referring to organic versus synthetic species, both share a common domain of molecular data which is accessed by use of the transform function of the pokeball.
A ditto can become a matching dataset for either a regi or a weedle.>Also since you mention the device only making distinction of Pokémon via datasets, does it mean it is perfectly possible for a Pokébal to catch and dematerialize a human provided it is given an adequate genetic dataset? In theory it would be possible to do with an accurate enough genetic datasets of the target in question. Problem is: compared to respective species of pokemon, the human species have much more genetic diversity. Human testing results in rather grotesque abominations unfortunately since mismatches in the individual's code are all too common even if a particular subject's DNA is carefully replicated. Also humans grow slowly over time (no spontaneous evolution) which makes the shock of energy transformation very often fatal.
>What are the implications of the ability to dematerialize and "reset" a creature, Pokémon or not, on aspects such as consciousness and individuality?Too many to enumerate in an online post. I would suggest an introductory reading of "Matter and Consciousness" by Paul Churchland if the subject intrigues you.
