>>40285823No surprises here, and no reflection either. You spin basic narratives to prop up unexamined and uninvestigated basic impulses, and actively misinform and disinform your own mind in order to pass off a fetishism as something tasteful. I can ask for everyone all the critical questions pertaining to your ideas of what constitutes a "good" design, but the real question is why *you* are not doing so already.
