>>32481057Surprised this is the only mention of parodies.
and yeah, the part where the trainer or some other in-universe becomes a mouthpiece for the author to shit on Pokemon designs past what they played is a tried and true target of my fervor.
We get it, your idea of what Pokemon should be is in conflict with what GameFreak actually intended and you were oblivious to the fact that not all Pokemon were based on animals, despite your insisting it was. You could have saved yourself weeks of drawing to look at the damned Pokedex instead of believing a myth fueled by tunnel vision and making a "funny internet cartoon" perpetuating said lie that only people you can caricature later will fact check.
