>>48963253David, it costs nothing for myself and another anons to scroll up and read
>>48953105. You're into year 3 of this behaviour now. If you could prove that it wasn't always Grandia requests then that's swell for that point, but it means nothing for the greater one.
Now. For the last couple of posts, I've made an effort to take an interest in you and see things from your perspective. Most people in this thread have basically outright lambasted you for behaviours that you show no effort to examine or rectify. Here you have a great chance to try discussing things. But if cheap and blatantly dishonest answers are your response to that kindness, all I can say is that you will prove your detractors right.
You can alsosay nothing and disengage from this conversation, as apparently you have done many times before. Is it not time to try something different?
