>>53432994See what I mean.
You have to purposefully misinterpret things and see what isn't there for example this
>Arven saying "wait that doesn't make sense" Never actually happens. He hints at a bootstrap paradox, one of the many different time paradoxes and then immediately changes the subject.
>Occulture books obviously being full of shit, The Occulture books don't play into any theory outside of the imagination theory because the games say they they're a "dubious" magazine. It also wouldn't make sense for Turo to make a time machine or any machine if he was inspired because only one Occulture book in Violet is about the future.
Basically to say they're fact is taking away the wrong message.
>Walking Wake (how is Suicune, a mammalian creature with panther/dog/we traits evolved from a fucking raptor) This one doesn't even need an explanation, they're not animals, they're monsters. Pokemon evolution doesn't have to follow real world evolution.
What you should be thinking is how can it be imagination if it's so drastically different from the imagined design.
>is evidence enough to start thinking that MAYBE the story isn't about time travel and not everything should be taken at face value.And this is the irony of it all.
Not only are you proving the point in trying to debunk time travel rather than provide evidence for imagination, YOU are taking things at face value rather than reading between the lines so you missed Arven's time travel foreshadow in a chekhov's gun moment and believe Occulture, something the game says to doubt.
To top it off the only response from imaginationfags is to continue what they're doing.
