>>35449755>Because the real lizard doesn't have a fucking huge visible scleraBut they neither have blue oval eyes. So you have no point here again. Indeed Salazzle line has the most realistic lizard eye.
>Because Charmander looks closer to SOME lizard eye while the two new Pokemon in the image resemble NO lizard eyeThis is wrong because the original pic is not discussing about specific but new gen vs first gen. This is why you can choose other examples from what he is trying to describe. If you say that a pokémon has realistic lizard eye and you compare with 2 pokémon which aren't the only lizard existing but you compare them just because they can easily support your argument, well this is cherry-picking, because you take the examples just for your convenience. This is why i talked about salandit and salazzle.
>Donkeys don't have huge perfectly oval shaped nostrils like Mudbray.Pic relared, yes they have it.
>Real horses don't have perfectly smooth legs like Mudbray and Mudsdale.What? Do you know what a clydsdale looks like? It looks more smooth because it has a muscle or fat mass higher than a regular horse, is it wrong?
>Because Pikachu's tail is clearly lightning bolt shaped. That's why it's less detailed. It's not less detailed for the sake of being less detailed like anything on new Pokemon.But if you say that it looks more like to a regular mouse, comparing to new gen mon or new gen style, it's wrong because Dedenne exists, but he just reused another pikachu, so it will look like that he's right. You can't say that new gen pokémon are less detailet without any reason when i already talked about why Fletchling looks that way and you can see by yourself why other pokémon could have a certain design, unless you're a braindead who believes unironically at those pics.
