>>22573613I'm not too worried about it looking a little cheaper, since I'm not having to put as much effort into it anyway.
I tried to do the OAG using my old method, but I had so much trouble making ends meet (literally) and keeping consistent thickness that it wasn't really worth it.
With the current lines I can get it done in about 3 tries, with the old ones I'd have to do a line a good 10-12 times to get it right...
But thanks for the critique, maybe for more detailed or personal drawings I'll go with the older lines.
... REALLY happy with this one...
I even went and made an example.
