>>57544700Yes, amazing you have to go to the 5th definition to argue that point, when a quick google spits this from Oxford's dictionary. I will say the American Heritage dictionary is the only one I've heard of as coming in a physical edition, which is why it likely has the same definition of "Seduce" as Oxford does and both prioritise its sexual connotations above its "tending to entice into a desired action" definition, as if humanity's usage of the world errs more towards humans enticing other humans into sex with them than enticing them to perjure themselves for fun and profit.
