>>24870243Titanic was an extraordinarily well-built ship, capable of having up to a quarter of her watertight compartments flooded without going down. Instead of a survivable 4/16, she instead had her front 6/16 compartments breached, which put the damage as far back as her bridge, a level of damage that even modern ships would either struggle, or be unable, to survive.
Comparing something to the Titanic isn't the insult you think it is: you're saying it's extremely well-made, resilient, and promising, but doomed by factors that are completely beyond its control.
