>>55976103>But it appears it's a much bigger deal for romantic relationships between humans and Pokémon specifically.Firstly "much bigger" is a prime sophistic bait, what is much and how you measure it, what is little and where is a border bettween them? Secondly from this
>You did correctly point out why it's not talked about so openly in the series does not follows this
> we do see does not support itWhat we have seen is several stories about pokephilia in the past and jokes on that theme in todays. To derive theories about “forbidden pokephilia” and other fanon from such data is pure demagoguery. The only logical conclusions from this are that it existed and people were doing it.
>but with a large enough group of any individuals you can see patterns and similarities too as well as differences. At the level of all Pokémon in general, the only common characteristics are their use of energies and the ability to fight, possibly stemming from this. Making any statements about their characters and preferences - at this level - is a prime example of literally meaningless statements, choose at least one typing or even better evolutionary line.
