>>17571279That's perfect.
I cannot thank you enough.
>>17571036>>17570912You still got a long way to go on that shading wise.
>>17571269>>17571209I wouldn't even attempt to do particle systems and expect it to look not shit. If you want to try, go ahead, but even my autism powers are nothing....
Anyways, the gas on fumighast would actually either be volumetetirc, or solid and opaque.
Volumetric stuff is another beast entirely. On one hand it's easier to do on a base level since it's something you can do on a material basis, instead of a whole system of particles, but on another hand if you REALLY want it to look good it requires a lot more tweaking, vs. once you get a particle system looking good, you are more or less on the right track, in my experience.
You could also go the route of simulating a volumetric space with a particle system, but then you are getting into really fucking complex simulations that take days to weeks to render.
I'm no expert, of course, so I might and very well am wrong about some of that
>>17571499Agreed, but at the same time, if a design inaccurate sprite has a few things better about it than a accurate one, an attempt should be made to splice the best parts of both sprites
