>>43494090Except no one ever behaves in these types of threads. It's all the same.
>Criticised something about this gen? You're a [gen-fanboy]!>Praised something about this gen? You're a [gen-fanboy]!>Have a rebuttal against a claim I made about this gen? You're a [gen-fanboy]!>Seethe, cope, dilate, buzzwordsbuzzwordsbuzzwordsbuzzwordsbuzzwords-And the thing is, most, if not all, of these are entirely subjective and yet, people here are so desperate to spread their opinions it as a fact. Hell, literally the first post of this thread is about "muh reddit", "muh resetera", while anons reply with either "based", "cringe" or "seethe [gen-fanboy]". You will never have a proper discussion on pokemon generations with these types of retards waiting around to ruin it.