>>57057017>Nintendo isn't suing over the designs. and?
>Why did you bring up the lawsuit if that isn't even your standard for plagiarism? because the game would have sold less if they weren't blatant pokemon knock offs
>To substantiate the claim that Palworld is only successful thanks to plagiarism. there are a lot of Chinese pokemon like mobile games who made millions and got sued by game freak like every year
>So far, all you've proved is that monster collection games don't need to copy Pokemon to be successful. That just makes Palworld look better.it makes Palworld look worse because they can't succeed without being a pokemon wannabe
