>>54768880> imagination anons never actually bring up anything that supports their stance but rather just try to "debunk" time travel.To be fair that's not completely true, they always cling to life to that one comment from Arven haha
>>54768998>Logic clearly implies is imaginationLook, I'm not saying there's nothing about imagination involved, but at the end of the day it comes out as a cheap cover all explanation for everything we can't explain directly (because the story hasn't been completed and we're missing info)
> I can't explain this, must be imagination!Like this it's super easy to find "logical" explanations to everything.
