>>53335298>Not sure if retarded or not but we can see the tones of the spikes in the photographAnd you don't think the fact that they're in the shade had anything to do with that.
The more you speak the more I see why you believe in such a half-baked theory.
>that doesn't explain how the rest of Tusk's body keeps its lighter shade.It doesn't, you yourself proved it right now as you can see two different shades on the left and right image.
>And yet the "blur" is weak enough that we can make out things like Tusk's eyes,You can't.
You can make out the vague shape but no real details much like the left most face in this image
>>53335261>And all the blur in the world doesn't change the fucking LENGTH of somethingI literally gave you an image where that exact thing is happening, do you need more?
