>>38611515>>38611562thank you both for your answers. i was originally going to post something over 1700 characters long, but in hindsight i didn't need to because i realized i may have been summarizing how most posters ITT could possibly feel about this thread? maybe not. i don't want to pretend i know how you all feel or something, so it's best left unsaid. still, though. your words have been positive and thought-provoking. i thank you for that. perhaps there is more to life (and death) than we may know; i suppose i'll stick around for a while.
i mean, not in this thread, because today is going to be a bit busy, but i'll try to monitor it and bump it when i can.
oh, and to the first person i'm replying to: i share your sentiment regarding the inevitable death of this thread, but like OP stated earlier, there is the possibility of more threads like this one in the future. also, some of us will probably stick around for this week's Eevee Friday, if you're into those.
>>38611732thank you very much for the shout-out. the way you wrote your original post resonated with me very much; i felt like this thread had a lot of potential, so i've been trying my best to make sure it doesn't disappear. i'm going to be here for the next one.
>>38611537i'm not particularly opposed to that idea, and i think it can work out sometimes, but from personal experience, it tends to get kind of circlejerky to the point where it doesn't spark any joy. we'll see. it's up for OP to decide, really. 