>>48369411>>48371672>>48371656>>48372071So I went ahead and backquoted all examples of non-argument I could find with CTRL+F that weren't green texted.
Here's the Oxford Dictionary's definition of argument. I think you'll find that both apply to everything everyone in this thread has been saying. People have given a buttload of reasons as to why older monsters are okay but Vanillite isn't.
You keep asking for more reasons, and then you get them, and then you act like these reasons are somehow contradictory. By the very definition of an argument, the argument against Vanillite is getting stronger and stronger. You also keep claiming you've debunked and refuted things, but you haven't. You just toss out more designs and go
>But this is okay??? Why???Which is weird. You cited Conkeldurr from Vanilite's own Generation but won't pull any other examples from there, which is weirder.
Also I laughed at how those anons immediately said Conkeldurr is shit too.>>48369772/thread
>>48372697Musharna is based and I like it as an alternate interpretation of a dream eating tapir, but I agree most of Gen 5's dex is ugly as sin. Way too many homages to Kanto mons for no reason. I'd have been content with just a few alternate takes. There's lots of based stuff in Gen 5 too though, like Braviary and Mienshao.
