>>40136741>Fine, but the trainer isn't stronger than it.Point was it can in fact lose.
>Because it's a waste of time?Do I need to repeat why it wouldn't be?
> I wouldn't see a reason to develop technology to defend myself when I can already blow up citiesWhy use a granade to hammer a nail. Also you can't conceive how having technology to instantly capture invaders and rivals wouldn't be useful to you? You'd just kill them? You're evil.
>Counterpoint: Saitama.Saitama does not have infinite strength. Saitama can't even kill a mosquito. Saitama needs to eat meaning his energy does deplete, ONE has said that Saitama is as strong as the story needs, meaning his inconsistent strength or lack of if is a narrative device at the whims of the author for the sake of the story being told at the time.
