>>29030588It is important to remember that "Trump" was a brand long before he was a candidate. In the US anyway, there seems to be some law that suggests that one MUST defend a trademark, resulting in such silliness as Warner Bros. suing a small boy who was selling homemade batarangs on the street corner, and other such nonsense, even if they would like to avoid the bad press associated with frivolous lawsuits. In other words, I would wager it was Trump: The Brand: the legal dept., rather than Trump: The Man.
