>>39913930The first posts wording implies that a 0* has no value, despite having a picture of (presumably) you keeping it despite it not "having any value". The second post says "If it has no value, transfer it" which gives an ambiguity vibe, suggesting that the value of a pokemon is determined by its owner. That does not add up to "0*s are worthless". Poor wording is what's causing all of this.
