>>38703236>That wasn't his intention on bringing up the point. His intention was that it's a drawing. If rape doesn't matter because no consent is given despite some drawings clearly saying "No." (which implies consent within said universe),then why should other laws and things matter, especially when said supposed 10 year old (which no protagonist is mind you) looks nothing like a 10 year old in art? Firstly drawings arent living breathing things and dont have rights. Consent cannot be argued here and I really should not have to explain this to you. Im sure youd even agree with me when I say that in a drawing you arent harming anyone (or at least directly). However this does not stop pedos or lets use your language... ephebophiles, from being a threat to children in the real world. Fapping to a pokegirl itself isnt a problem, but fapping to pokegirls who are specifically designed to be underage is symptomatic of a problem with you.
>Now with that said, I like how you conveniently have ignored the people straight up proving that the games themselves say that the Gen 5/6 protagonists are not 10 years old, as characters directly say they are older when those characters themselves are 17, which implies said protagonists are at least of the age of 18 within Unova and Kalos.Ive already addressed that. Artists can pin an age on any piece of drawn work to call it legal.
>Now would you like to continue having a proper discussion using logic and actual intelligence, or would you like to keep spouting buzzwords to try and get your incredibly poor point across? Which will it be?You are guaranteed a pedo if you are this entrenched in your logic. I dont know if I should feel sorry that a human being genuinely holds your opinions or applaud you for a successful troll attempt. Ok, you won. I want off Mr Bones Wild Ride.
>>38693708This poster spells it out perfectly for the pedos in the back.
