>>39613301>Please elaborate.I thought I was pretty concise let me try again. Do you believe that if you think it, it must be true or accurate.
>I made no conclusions>hypothesis.You realize any hypothesis requires a conclusion right? You made one in regards to the Westermarck Effect and how it would apply to a male human and female pokemon who grew up together. However your logic is faulty since you're applying human psychology also to the pokemon, how the fuck would you know that applies when its clearly not human and also
not real. You don't know how it thinks, you'd need run experiments to find that shit out.
It'd be bias get though as you say it'd be a fascinating study only you've already made a conclusion. You don't make conclusions then support it, you'll end up twisting facts to fit it rather then form theories to explain facts.
Is clear enough Anon?
