>>32560531>>32561493See
>>32562333But it doesn't even matter. The reference was to illustrate a point that fictional characters don't need to abide by the standard average growth and development rate of modern day Homo sapiens.
I mean, you could take Konata Izumi for example, or really any of thousands of fictional characters that are ludicrously old or young or whatever. Either way, it's an arbitrary numerical value, that only has any meaning in real human growth rates, affixed to an imaginary character. The reason why you're not attracted to real 14 year olds is because they look and act like children, mostly. A fictional character could be 8 and still look and act older than you. The number 8 then has no predictive capability in establishing how mature that character is, making it irrelevant.
