>>51049966The design behind his cards is okay. The other major card derived from him was red card but with a discard cost.
Though the original is something alright. If this card was an actual reverse oak it would have allowed mill atleast, but its just a shitpost in its current state.
>>51050421Oak doesn't even change his team beyond the used starter, I really doubt it was an issue of "but what would be a sixth".
They probably just decided it didn't really fit the archetype they wanted Oak and the earlier professors to fall under. Or didn't like any of the scenarios they came up with for whatever reason.
