>>12991310I don't know what's so hard to understand about what I'm saying.
There have been "models" of atoms that people are generally familiar with, seen on the left. These have been around, and prevalent in pop-culture and the like since at least the 50's. It is common knowledge now.
Quarks are a more in-depth concept. Quarks are not talked about much, if at all, in elementary/middle/high school science classes, or in general society.
People get atoms. They don't get quarks. Using the atom as a reference makes a better Pokemon.
