>>21836032Alright, so good news, we all agreed enough to at least have majorities on at least everything.
How I see we can deal with this is that:
>for multiple results above 66%, it'll be in the next survey as a sudden death; simple majority wins. Like anon stated here>>21836086 they're all results we're already happy with, just have to choose the one we'll be more happy with.>for the orange simple majority results, we'll put them along with other name and type suggestions and see where that gets usThe bad news: there were a LOT of names, which lead to a lot of voters going tl;dr toward the end and skipping altogether. Be diligent friends, we want the best for this project
