>>43480590>>43479231my bad.
>>43471410>ci like mantine, marrowak, and sunflora on the same team. magmeme is unaesthetic and i never liked dunsparce. passing grade, low marks on aesthetics, but you don't care if you're chad anyway.
>>43471466>bthis is a cool team, i like the pairings. very diverse, dynamic spread, and i like all the pokemon. it's not thematic, but you get solid b.
>>43471538>d+i like the mons, but not all on the same team. not very thematic or aesthetic. no real consistency.
>>43471544>a++arnold's the fucking man.
>>43471661>b+macho vibe, solid team, good mons, strategically speaking it's not great, but it's still got that chad aesthetic, so it's good. b+ to a- if machamp is actually your ace.
>>43471696>ai hate everyone on this team, seriously don't use any of these, and yet they come together as being absolutely kino for some reason. amazing. this is bbeg/executive-tier. good creativity.
>>43472482>c+i have an aversion to legendaries, so mew2 automatically knocked you down a letter grade, and raichu looks completely out of place. the other 4 look absolutely amazing together though. if it had just been them it would've been an a.
>>43472833>cscizor, sandslash, and kabutops look great together. the rest look like they accidentally spilled into a great team and don't belong there.
>>43473721>b+it's a solid team, aesthetically and strategically. viable and simply good.
>>43473745>cit's cute, unless you're a guy, in which case it's really gay. it's ever gayer if the mons are guys too.
>>43474041>cit has coverage, but it is painful to look at.
>>43474712>a+here we have aesthetic, coverage, and diversity. it's a truly kino team and i admire your taste.
>>43474788>di like all of the mons, but only raichu and clef go together. not aesthetic.
>>43475294>fi don't like anything about it. you mixed too many traits (menace, cutesy, spirited, grace, etc.) together.
>>43475468>nebby runsin order you posted
>b-, b, b+, b, b, c+ 