>>46628637You're arguements for Cyndaquil and Fennikin are often incongruent. But someone who's position boils down to "huh huh pattern go burr" I wouldn't expect you to have an understanding of confirmation bias, pareidolia, or assuming the conclusion. When you look at Nostradomis, for example, you see people reading his 'prophecies', then combing a history book until they see a significant historical event and because monke brain, use hindsight to go "wow, that must be what he meant! He totally predicted 9/11!" Before you say ,'b-b-but we predicted starters!" Fennikin isn't any more a dog than a seal is. Pic related. What Cyndaquil would even vaguely resemble if your theory was true.
