>>57071155>I’m fine with agreeing to disagree.>"I'm more than happy doubling down and sticking to my original argument that Surge is not only a bad effect (it's not a bad effect) but it also has bad targets (it has 1 decent target)">"I would rather be objectively wrong than admit that maybe I was being a little harsh or extreme"Alright then. If you are happy to be wrong, then you can be wrong.
https://www.pokemonmeta.com/top-decks/community-tournaments/ursiiday's-pocket-weekly-(1536-players)/6/pikachu-ex/hanamon/tNc0g 