>>38674606>Assdeer is sexualized as fuck It's origin and basis justifies whatever sexualization it does have whether you want to admit this or not.
>Just because you have a concept doesn't mean you have to follow it to the fucking TThat's like pointing to pic related and saying it's based on a playboy bunny. When it isn't. (it's de-sexualized and gender neutral interpretation of Lopunny.) That's threason why Lopunny, Mege Lopunny, Salazzle, etc. All have highly sexualized designs. It's not because GF wanted furries to fap to it, it's because it's basis called for it.
>You don't see GF making that type of explanation for mons like Lopunny or Sazzle.Because they don't have to. Someone else makes it for them. If anything I would've never guessed Lopunny was based on playboy bunny until I looked it up. For the longest I just thought it was an awkward rabbit thing on two legs. Same with Salazzle, thought it was just a hyper sexualized lizard, until I looked up what it's based on.
>Assdeer is the worse design I've ever see here and people trying to justify this fucking train wreck for the sole purpose of fapping to it is fucking cringey. Kill yourself furfag.You're just seething at this point. Lol
Also:
>ASSderr >it's thigh makes it look like she has an ass on a 3/4th portrait! >sexualized!!! It doesn't have an ass, that's been debunked already.