>>29017199Of course there's gonna be a GF white knight apologist that's against an option where literally everyone wins.
>breakable difficultyThere are tons of examples that have interchangeable difficulty levels that work. The tales series for one.
Is it so hard to understand that people can play games for different reasons? Especially with a franchise like pokemon, where there's so many different aspects to it. And people with varying skill levels.
Your argument basically sums up to "if you don't like it don't play it". Why is it a problem for you that people are discussing ways to improve the series for everyone? How can you be THIS autistic?
And before you start spouting shit like "pokemon has always been an easy kids game", again, people have fucking varying skill levels. What's wrong with having something like the challenge mode from BW2 again? Or having battle tower-level AI with better teams & movesets? Nothing. There's no reason to complain because it's an OPTION. You might find OHKO-ing everything in your path to be fun, and we don't care because that's how you have fun. We all have fun in different ways, what's so hard to understand about this?
