>>33330075I've had that written up for a while, and only posted it because I wished there were more things like it. Honestly, the closest I've found is that silly pokemon mating guide, which includes some creative descriptions of the biology of certain mons. I'm very tempted to write more notes similar to the ones on scrafty for each mon I write about, but clearly now is not the time for that. If I had to guess, the next would either be froge or bisharp. Human-based mons are significantly harder to analyze, though. What's bisharp act like? A samurai? An honorable fighter samurai, or a pretentious murderer samurai?
Open question: anyone else compile descriptions of the biological characteristics of their mons for the sake of reference while writing? As cge said, a house bull is going to look at problems from a bull's perspective, but if you don't know what a bull's perspective is, you can't write it.
