>>42119353>damagecontrol.jpgi wouldn't normally respond with a novel but that filename is the dumbest thing i've read this year. i'm assuming that you think that other anon (
>>42115693) is me (
>>42107731,
>>42114855,
>>42117065), because
>racist little bitch who thinks they're tough behind a screen trying to get back at someone on the internetimplies that the person you are responding to was present earlier in the conversation. i'm also inferring that you think calling someone a "racist little bitch" is damage instead of an obvious cope.
now, i personally don't know any racists who look like pic related, but i sure do know a ton of faggots with "punch a nazi" written on their faceberg wall who look nigh identical.
it's fucking hilarious (and in this case ironic) when betas like yourself get on the internet to call racists weak from behind a computer screen. weak relative to who? limp-wristed man-children with unhinged jaws? lmfao
i can't speak for the other anon, but i speak my mind publicly all of the time. putting racists in their place is a loser's fantasy. no antifa clown is going to do shit if they aren't in a group (too weak and scared when alone), and even then i'm still saying what i think.
keep coping the way you have been and throw in the word "incel" while you're at it. i'm told that women prefer men who walk on eggshells for fear of upsetting other people to men who speak their mind. maybe you'll get some puss!
