>>32564924The staff are people too, they make mistakes sometimes and aren't available 24/7 basis. However, I'm not staff so this is strictly in my own lurking of /vp/ for 4 years.
I personally don't have an opinion on Masuda posting. I don't know what to call it.
>No x pokemon >current year threads even when there are x pokemon in current year are just shitposting however. It's like starting a thread that says ">2017, STILL NO ELECTRIC RAT POKEMON" >>32481160Thicc threads are fine because its a modern day normie fetish that doesn't break blue board rules. As long as its Pokemon related, and doesn't show exposed vagina, penis, asshole, clit, nipples or its fine.
>>32563348 This was just posted today, let the staff figure out what they want to do with it. In all reality, it isn't shitposting, and is mostly normie fetish tier stuff that doesn't break blue board rules.
>>32541039That thread is just armorshipping. We've had it for about 3 years now. What you should be complaining about is the anti armorshipping autismos who literally flood the board with images of shitty toilets.
Again, I'm not a member of the staff, so this post may be completely moot as I don't know exactly what they are thinking; but years of lurking tells me this is most likely the reasoning. I could be wrong, I'm human too.