>>47459284That's terrible though. It looks too similar to Dragonite so what's the point? Even regular Dragonite looks better.
Make it similar in concept to pic related as an alternative evo for Dragonair instead of retconning the existing Dragonite. Dragonite is cool, but Dragonair deserves a proper evolution.
>>47459367It doesn't. It's literally Dragonite with Dragonair traits slapped on. It's still a Dragonite and that's the issue.