>>25228290Even if we'd had a million real leaks before this would still seem too good to be true, so many cool mons I've been wanting forever. I think that's the biggest doubt I have (besides >implying leaks are ever real) is that this seems like a wishlist more than something Game Freak would actually do.
>all those dual-typed mons>all those new type combinations>all those new concepts and minimal repeats of animals we already haveIt can't possibly be real but I really want it to be.
>>25228343>yfw a new pokemon is revealed and it happens to share a name and a type with one of the pokemon in this leak, but it's just a coincidence and the whole thing is revealed to be fake a month later>yfw no face 