>>23333116So where do we go next? Here’s a few Pokemon I think are good candidates for babies, based on those categories.
>Pokemon who look too grown-up to be babiesYes! : Tropius, Pinsir, Scyther, Kangaskhan, Carnivine, Alomomola
Maybe? : Skarmory,
Probably not, but they’re technically viable : Farfetch’d, Stantler, Girafarig, Audino
>Rare PokemonLapras!! + Heracross, Lickitung, Tangela, maybe Torkoal?
>Linking up evolutionary lines Yes! : Miltank / Tauros, Throh / Sawk
Maybe? : Solrock, Lunatone
>Cute / Popular PokemonYes! : Absol, Kecleon
Maybe? : Zangoose, Seviper
I really like baby Pokemon. I think they’re fun and interesting, and it doesn’t really hurt anyone to have them in the game. I just wish they served a better purpose.
(I actually really hate Mantyke and Munchlax, but that’s just because I think their designs aren’t as good as their evos deserve.)
My demands for making babies better :
> Remove Incense.> Unique egg graphics. Not for every single family of Pokemon, but how about for every egg group, at least? Or maybe, one for every egg group, and baby Pokemon get their own egg patterns, since that's only a handful more.> More unique moves. How about truly unique moves? Literally for babies only.> What if you could train a Pokemon's IVs while it was a baby? Or you could change its nature while it's still in its formative years?> What if babies gained EVs twice as fast? 