>>56882977True, I’m basing my argument in the best case scenario. However, that’s still more ethical than porn of 2D animals, because there’s literally no best case scenario for attraction to animals.
>>56882983I’m not accusing you, nor am I spouting a “logic”, I’m stating facts. Shooting guns in call of doody isn’t comparable to porn of a digital dog-fox-cat creature.
Hell, a furry anthro version of an Eeveelution is fine, because furries are essentially humans. No, this doesn’t apply to Gardevoir, Zoroark, Delphox, et cetera, since they have the same social standing as animals.
