>>54003904>The reason why Time Travel theorists believe that Paradox Pokémon are 'paradoxes' is because they come from the past or the future, but that's not a paradox. Bringing a Pokémon from the past to the future doesn't create a paradox, for example. This only applies with future Pokémon, and even then it's questionable because the paradoxical effect (if we follow grandfather paradox) would only affect the future, not the present. But sure, I'll give you that one. Future Paradox Pokémon technically *are* paradoxes. Past Pokémon would not. Does reviving a fossil of Aerodactyl imply a paradox, now?You should really educate yourself on the predestination paradox, which ironically was the first post you responded to and chose to ignore. You're now responding to another anon that just explained it to you and agreed with them. The ancient/future names are nothing but a moniker, they exist because they exist. The events occurring are the only thing that matters.
Pic related is the timeline of the movie "Predestination". Is that movie the MC John is his own mother and father and is the reason they met and conceived him. He has no start point, he just exists. The thing people are not taking into account is that Terapogos has been introduced as 3 different creatures: the pendant turtle, terapogos itself, and the creature Heath drew in the book. Obviously the main speculation is the one in the book is the tera form or complete form, which makes no sense if we're going to meet the pendant turtle first. Obviously events are not occurring in chronological order.
