>>40987805Because too many people are ignorant about its existence. I've got plenty of other comparisons to work with, don't worry. But most of those other games are current gen. XCX is the one that is both on Nintendo hardware AND from last gen, so there is no excuse for the shills to work with besides "art style", which I can very easily debunk in every single facet of the game; from character model rendering, to environmental detail, etc.
My current pic related showcases two games available on Ps4. "Oh it's Ps4 so you can't compare it to a "handheld device" like the Switch!" Except both of those games run at 60 frames per second, while Pokemon SwSh only runs at 30. You have any idea how many visual sacrifices are necessary to get games running at 60fps on a goddamn jaguar-based CPU? If the Ps4 had halved the framerate they could have made the games look even more detailed and impressive. As is, it is not inconceivable to port either of these games to the Switch with the current graphical settings but at half the framerate and lower resolution. Essentially what you are seeing in the screenshot is fully capable of running on Switch hardware in real-time.
