>>41296715>I never made this statement, this is just your shitty ass interpretation of what I said because you need to strawman to win arguments. I said they were eyelashes just like I'd say whatever is on Gardevoir's head is its hair, fag.Literally you
>"t's a girl. The "its eyelashes are actually face point" theory is absolutely retarded because it's a footballer (or soccer playeri f you're an amerimutt) and footballers don't use that kind of face paint."Which was proven incorrect because eyeblack is super common in sports in general. Just because you can't find google images on it doesn't mean it doesn't exist tard.
>no, FAG. Gardevoir's hair doesn't behave like hair at all, but you can still tell that it's hair because you don't need things to be 100% realistic to realize what they are unless you're an autistic retard. If Gardevoir's hair behaved like hair then you would be able to see separate strands of hair, it wouldn't defy gravity like that, it wouldn't look the exact same in every member of its species, etc. Which leaves me to...Yes it does, dumbass.
>You're being an autistic retard like I just described. Anyone realizes what the thing on its eyes are supposed to represent, no one thought "it's face paint!"--Are you saying the guy in pick related isn't a football player? just for clarification. I just want you to confirm that that's what you're saying, the person in this picture with eye black isn't a football player.
Also yes anon, it's more believable that the Pokemon based off of football has eye black under it's eyes than them being weird stylized eyelashes that the designer could have just given them.
Also your gardevoir comparison doesn't work because again it's hair is apart of it's body, the markings are literally just flatly on the face. It's the same way the legs are meant to represent sporting socks and the tuff of red fur around the legs are football shorts.
