>>29278739>And then also talking about content.>Be thankful that we have more than, literally, one pokemon................................................................................what? You expect me to get angry about this?At what point does it mention content?
Also, the very fact the posts exists, means people care about the AMOUNT of new mons, therefore making all of this about the amoun.
If people didnt really care about the amount of newer mons and just the other content, then there would be no discussions whatsoever about this because there would be no issue. Not to mention the datamining and the demo didnt reveal much newer content, yet these debates started when the amount of new mons was leaked.
The discussion is about the amount of newer mons. Proven by the fact it started now and not before.
>they made up for itBut I never said they made up for it. They didnt made up for it and, actually, they had to make up for Gen 6´s lack of newer mons.
>In summation, XY and SM have less literal numbers added to the dex, but the appreciable content remains roughly the same over the years.It´s not what we´re debating. Also, newer mons are more important than other gameplay content. This franchise is, and this will probably blow your retarded apologist mind, called "Pokémon".
>>29278817>Or you go by the actual differences that matter.dex number, yeah.
>>29278884>Life isn't black and white anon. >pulling the "literally everything is relative" cardfuck off cuck.
